Defendant is charged with Conspiracy Distributed Heroin/Fentanyl.  Original sentence was 10 years, Firm successfully argued a Rule 35 motion for reduction before Judge Cannon.  Original sentence reduced to 50 months.

Jane Doe is accused of using the U.S. mail to defraud her victim out of $100,000. She is alleged to have sent fraudulent mailings, including letters and packages, which contained false information and induced the victim to send money to her under false pretenses. Doe is charged with one count of mail fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

John Smith is accused of defrauding investors through the sale of securities. He is alleged to have made false and misleading statements about the financial health of a company, in order to sell its stocks at an inflated price. When the truth about the company's financial condition was revealed, the value of the stocks plummeted, causing investors to suffer significant losses. Smith is charged with one count of securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

Jane Doe is accused of defrauding multiple financial institutions and insurance companies through a series of elaborate schemes. According to the indictment, Doe created false documents and used stolen identities to obtain loans, credit cards, and insurance policies. Doe allegedly caused losses of over $2 million to the banks and insurance companies, and personally profited by hundreds of thousands of dollars. The investigation into Doe's activities was conducted by the FBI's White Collar Crime Division, and Doe will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

John Doe, a suspect in a state investigation into an alleged embezzlement scheme, is the subject of a pre-arrest investigation being conducted by the local police department. During the investigation, detectives will gather evidence and conduct interviews with witnesses in an effort to build a case against Doe. Doe's defense attorney, Jane Smith, has been made aware of the investigation and is in contact with the detectives to ensure that Doe's rights are protected. If the detectives believe that they have sufficient evidence to charge Doe with a crime, they will present the case to the prosecutor's office for review and a decision on whether to file charges. If charges are filed, Doe will be arrested and the case will proceed to court.

Sarah Johnson, an employee at a large corporation, is accused of using her position to embezzle company funds through a series of wire transactions. The government alleges that Johnson transferred money from the company's accounts to her own personal accounts and to accounts belonging to her accomplices, causing a loss of over $500,000. Johnson has pleaded not guilty to the charge and is currently awaiting trial.

Jane Smith is accused of defrauding a lender in connection with a mortgage loan. She is alleged to have submitted false information on a mortgage application, including false income and employment information, in order to obtain a loan that she otherwise would not have qualified for. As a result of the fraud, the lender suffered significant losses when the loan defaulted. Smith is charged with one count of mortgage fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison.

‍

John Smith is accused of engaging in a scheme to launder over $5 million in illegal proceeds through various businesses and bank accounts. According to the indictment, Smith received the funds from the sale of illegal narcotics, and used them to purchase real estate and other assets in an effort to conceal the illegal source of the funds. Smith has been charged with one count of money laundering, and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison if convicted. The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, and is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Internal Revenue Service.

Jane Smith is accused of intentionally failing to pay over $500,000 in federal income taxes owed from her business earnings over a period of several years. According to the indictment, Smith made false statements on her tax returns and concealed income from the Internal Revenue Service. Smith has been charged with one count of tax evasion, and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison if convicted. The case is being investigated by the Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation Division and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.

John Doe, a former city councilman, is accused of accepting bribes from a local real estate developer in exchange for favorable treatment on zoning and building projects. According to the indictment, Doe accepted over $100,000 in cash and other gifts, and used his official position to influence the outcome of votes on the council. Doe has been charged with one count of honest services fraud and one count of accepting bribes, and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison if convicted. The case is being investigated by the FBI's Public Corruption Unit, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey.

Jane Doe, a procurement officer for a federal agency, is accused of accepting bribes from multiple contractors in exchange for awarding them government contracts. According to the indictment, Doe received over $200,000 in cash and other gifts, and used her position to steer contracts worth millions of dollars to the bribing contractors. Doe has been charged with one count of accepting bribes and one count of honest services fraud, and faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison if convicted. The case is being investigated by the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland.

John Smith is accused of stealing over $50,000 worth of government property while working as a federal employee. According to the indictment, Smith stole a variety of items including computer equipment, office supplies, and tools, and sold them for personal profit. Smith has been charged with one count of theft of government property, and faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison if convicted. The case is being investigated by the Inspector General's Office of the agency where Smith was employed, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas.

Jane Doe is accused of participating in a conspiracy to defraud the government, and of subsequently disobeying a court order in connection with the case. According to the indictment, Doe and her co-conspirators submitted false claims for government benefits, and Doe later refused to testify before a grand jury investigating the scheme. Doe has been charged with one count of conspiracy and one count of contempt, and faces a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison for the conspiracy charge and an additional 6 months for the contempt charge if convicted. The case is being investigated by the FBI's White Collar Crime Division, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado.

John Doe is accused of illegal possession and trafficking of firearms. According to the indictment, Doe obtained guns through straw purchases, and sold them to individuals who were prohibited from owning firearms. Doe has been charged with multiple counts of illegal possession of firearms, illegal transfer of firearms, and making false statements in connection with the acquisition of firearms. Doe faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for each count if convicted. The case is being investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Jane Doe is accused of violating the terms of her probation, which she was serving after being convicted of embezzlement. According to the indictment, Doe left the jurisdiction without permission, failed to report to her probation officer, and used drugs, all of which are prohibited under the terms of her probation. Doe has been charged with one count of probation violation, and faces a maximum penalty of an additional year in prison if convicted. The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois, and is being investigated by the U.S. Probation Office.

John Doe is seeking to have his criminal records related to a conviction for possession of a controlled substance expunged. Doe has completed all terms of his sentence, including probation, and has not been convicted of any crimes since. Doe is requesting that the court seal the records of his conviction, so that they are not available to the public or to potential employers. The petition will be heard by a judge, who will consider factors such as the nature of the offense, the time that has passed since the conviction, and Doe's rehabilitation. If granted, the expungement will allow Doe to move forward with a clean record.

John Doe is accused of driving recklessly and endangering the safety of others on a public roadway. According to the indictment, Doe was observed by a police officer driving at a high rate of speed, weaving in and out of lanes, and running multiple red lights. Doe has been charged with one count of reckless driving, and faces a maximum penalty of up to 30 days in jail and a fine of up to $300 if convicted. The case is being prosecuted by the District Attorney's Office for the County of Suffolk, and is being investigated by the Suffolk County Police Department.

Jane Doe is accused of participating in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine across state lines. According to the indictment, Doe obtained large quantities of the drug from suppliers in Mexico and coordinated the distribution of the drug to various locations in the United States. Doe has been charged with one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, and faces a maximum penalty of life in prison if convicted. The case is being investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, and will be prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California.

John Doe, a suspect in a federal investigation into an alleged fraud scheme, is meeting with a prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney's Office to discuss the possibility of charges being brought against him. Doe's defense attorney, Jane Smith, will also be present at the meeting. During the consultation, the prosecutor will provide Doe and his attorney with information about the evidence against him and the potential charges that could be brought. Doe and his attorney will have an opportunity to present any defenses or mitigating factors that they believe are relevant to the case. The outcome of the consultation could range from charges being filed immediately, to the case being declined or deferred for further investigation.

John Doe, a healthcare provider, is accused of submitting false claims to Medicare for services that were not provided to patients. The government alleges that Doe engaged in a scheme to defraud the healthcare system and obtained over $100,000 in illegal proceeds as a result. Doe has pleaded not guilty to the charge and is currently awaiting trial.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque tincidunt neque at rhoncus tempor. Praesent ac lacinia augue, vel lobortis purus. Nullam faucibus augue faucibus ante sodales, non bibendum tellus pretium. Mauris interdum dignissim tincidunt. Duis convallis sagittis tellus sit amet sagittis. Integer magna lacus, egestas sit amet facilisis non, gravida ut augue. Vivamus dapibus nisl a ex aliquam dapibus. Mauris tincidunt, neque venenatis fermentum condimentum, odio mi viverra ipsum, eget blandit mauris nibh nec nunc. Phasellus ac sollicitudin metus. Donec sagittis viverra nisi, id rutrum est. Phasellus sit amet vulputate eros.

Our client was charged with DUI in Lake County after crashing her vehicle into another vehicle at a stop light. At a motion to suppress, the arresting officer demonstrated a lack of knowledge of the administration of FSE’s. While the trial court denied Attorney Easton’s motion to suppress, he was able to convince the prosecutor that the weaknesses to the State’s case that were exposed at the motion hearing could cause the jury to acquit. The State agreed to resolve the case with a reckless driving conviction.